This Fluff Packs A Punch

The real main difference between Bewear and Furfrou is that Bewear hits a LOT harder and is more physically bulky due to much higher HP. I don't think anyone thinks Fluffy is better than Fur Coat. It's obvious Fur Coat is better.

Furfrou is, however, a competitively useless character.

After doing calculations, the only thing Furfrou can take better than Bewear are fire type moves and special moves, and even then, not that much better due to Bewear's much higher HP.

Furfrou and Bewear are both bulky pokemon with no good recovery options. The difference is that Bewear can actually threaten things while Furfrou has to rest stall.

  • 1/16 of Furfrou's 354 max HP: 22 HP
  • 1/16 of Bewear's 444 max HP: 27 HP

Where Toxapex is a Wall.

Bewear is a bulldozer.

Bewear's HP outweighs the difference in Special Defense so much that Furfrou can only take special hits only a couple of decimal places better than Bewear. And due to how Pokémon rounds decimals they will generally be taking the same amount of damage specially.

Furfrou only takes physical fire type moves about 5-ish percent better than Bewear usually. If the only thing Furfrou can take better physically is fire type moves, while Bewear takes EVERY other non-super effective type move MUCH better, and they take about the same from special moves, there's really no comparison on who has the better survivability.

Bewear hits like a bulldozer while Furfrou has no real strength when it comes to actual play. Bewear packs Hammer Arm, Superpower, Return, Ice Punch, Earthquake, Thunder Punch, Payback and more. Furfrou gets considerably less attacks to work with that are weaker and provide less coverage.

Bewear can beat:

  • Skarmory
  • Ferrothorn
  • Scizor
  • Tyranitar
  • Bisharp

and many other OU Steel and Rock types that think it may even have the possibility of staying in safely. Bewear also cannot get walled by stalling Pokémon like Toxapex and Celesteela because it packs Taunt. Furfrou cannot learn Taunt.

There is absolutely nothing superior about Furfrou to Bewear.

For every benefit that Fur Coat has over Fluffy, it is negated by Furfrou's terrible stats and terrible movepool. Bewear will always be selected more because it doesn't have the same weaknesses other Pokémon like Furfrou. Also, while I mentioned Toxapex this mon is not a synonym for Bewear, they are not interchangeable.

Pokemon: Alola

The average speed of all the Pokemon in Alola isn't actually lower than other generations by much, the issue is the most popular/commonly used Pokemon are slow.

The faster ones are mostly rare and/or late or post game which is a deterrent for many players. Some of these include:

  • Raichu
  • M-Metagross
  • Tapus
  • UBs
  • Flygon
  • Dugtrio
  • Salazzle
  • Dragonite
  • Lucario
  • Porygon-Z
  • Ninetales
  • Salamence
  • Garchomp

But then you have fast moving options like:

  • Crobat
  • Sharpedo
  • Alakazam
  • Talonflame

A lot of people would rather try out new Alolan Pokemon than use one they likely had before. This can also be countered if done properly, for example: whenever I battle a Bewear with Fluffy, I one shot it with my Salazzle using Flamethrower. If they placed A-Vulpix, A-Diglett and Minior on Melemele Island they'd get a lot less complaints about slow Pokemon. And you would have a more balanced hand. But many people ignore that.

Yet, with with proper balancing, for example, A-Forms like A-Raichu. There are plenty of Special Pokémon as well.

But you will notice that you mostly encounter Physical ones, whether it's because of Trainer representation, encounter rates or whatever else. They include stuff you can get like Abra. Or Magnemite. A lot of purely new Alolan Pokemon seem to be physical. Still, physical isn't the problem it's having moves that make direct contact that is the problem. Though to be fair finding a physical non-contact move that is SE on Bewear isn't easy but mons like Pelliper and other special guys are still available. It makes contact moves deal ineffective damage, and all fire moves are then super effective.

One example of how I play this is for me to use a 3/3 during my play through: Sylveon, Raichu, Rimbombee as specials and Decidueye, Golisopod, Bewear for physicals.

My Pancakes Don’t Fluff

We tried a new breakfast place yesterday and we're extremely impressed with their pancakes!

These pancakes were light, fluffy and chewy. They felt like big fluffy crumpets, just not as dense!

I'm used to make pancakes but they ended up being more crumbly and generally don't like them since they fill me up quickly. Crepes on the other hand are great as they are chewy but you just need to make the batter more runny, and they still come out dense.

Now I am on a quest to find the best solution to the pancake problem.

A quick Google search opened up a can of worms and basically left me thinking do I know flapjacks vs pancakes vs crumpets.

But I did learn that I was mixing wrong regardless of what I was making.

Always mix the dry and wet ingredients separately then add the dry to the wet. Also, never over mix the batter, doing so will result in flat, lousy cakes. Whipped egg whites also seems to be the common secret, and when I tried a set it works wonderfully.

But you do have to be very gentle.

I also mixed the wet and dry ingredients, but just barely to avoid gluten formation. Then I added the whites just before cooking.

Here are the ingredients by the way:

  • 3.5 oz Mixed Flour
  • 1 tsp Baking Powder
  • 1 Egg
  • 3 tbsp Sugar
  • 2.4 fl oz Milk
  • 2 tsp Vegetable Oil
  • ½ tsp Vanilla Extract

For the mixed flour I make my own mix which consists of normal flour cornstarch, look on the mixes in the store, it is the same thing. I expect it's that the baking powder that really makes the recipe awesome!

Fluffy Corgi Cuddles

Corgi's seem to be the internet dog right now. But anyone familiar with the breed, should surely know how lovable they are before long before the whole internet meme started.

But something few corgi lovers know is that they also come in fluffy a.k.a. cardigan corgis. Mine is adorably so, though hair is more of a problem.

It's not a desirable trait in a working animal because that coat doesn't protect against the elements as well as the classic double coat does. It's not all about the show ring.

Anyone deliberately breeding a "fluffy" corgi should not be breeding, because they clearly care more about cute puppies than anything else.

In the grand scheme of breeding for terrible traits, this isn't one of them.

How many breeders are legitimately breeding a working line? I suspect not many. Most of these dogs go to comfy homes where they are coddled and loved until they die of old age. A slightly less durable long coat is not going to hinder their lives much.

Frankly, there are better issues surrounding dog breeding to get angry over than this one, see my footnote about how you can change it. Like, I dunno, breeding for unnaturally stubby legs under an otherwise stocky body.

When bred correctly their legs do a perfect job holding up their bodies. The biggest issue is that you can't have them jump onto too much high furniture.

They really shouldn't do much jumping, none is ideal, as puppies and as they get bigger definitely be cautious of heights. Fitness does help. When they're more fit they can take more. Not saying you should be letting a fit corgi jump off the headrest of a couch onto the floor, but if you are having a corgi jump down off things make sure you're keeping them fit and healthy.

If you buy from a breeder that strictly follows breed standards, then you can look for an AKC breeder's license.

This makes them a vetted breeder with certain standards (take those standards for what they are).

Though AKC licensed breeders are usually doing it as a hobby. These people are generally not in it for a profit. They are not going to be a puppy mill or anything because they care very much for these dogs.

An AKC breeder, however, will not intentionally breed a fluffy corgi. Because it's not the breed standard. So, while it may not be terrible to take one home as a personal pet, that's not really the problem since you are supporting a reliable and animal-friendly breeder if you go through someone who is accredited.

The problem is that you're supporting a breeder who is breeding for the sake of being "cute", which is how we ended up with all these "designer breeds" in the first place. Those have no real breed standard and are bred purely for profit.


I know a lot of people think that breed standards are messed up. With the fluff, it really doesn't make a difference. But some of the other breeds have really unhealthy traits that are considered good, while the restorative traits are bad. And that, in my opinion, is messed up. When there are standards that I don't agree with I make my voice heard. And so can you. I do this by emailing the specific breed's club.

There is an easy way to find out which club should be contacted. Just do a search for breed club (typically named "dog breed" club of "country") that has the power to make the biggest change.

Though, the cynic is me feels like this may be one of those things where we have to wait for the people in charge to not be in charge anymore and the younger generation of leaders may be more willing to let the change happen. I think a few years ago in the UK they changed the pug breed standard for muzzles from "short" to "relatively short" which is a change in the right direction (literally) so there is always a chance.